The Diaconia of the Liturgy is probably the most visible work of the Deacon from the view point of the parish he serves in. The Deacon, as a member of the clergy, is most visible to the community when he assists the main celebrant at the summit of liturgical celebrations: The Sunday Mass. Here he fulfills his liturgical service which may include preaching the Word of God.
The words and actions of the Deacon in the Mass are directed by the General Instruction of the Roman Missal (GIRM). It is the responsibility of the Deacon to make sure he is fully conversant with these instructions in as far as they determine his role in the Mass. Certain Bishops Conferences use a GIRM which may have varied text and rubrics that have been approved by the Holy Father for use in their specific Conference. For example the GIRM approved for use by the United States Bishops Conference. The correct edition of the GIRM can be obtained from an on line Catholic library or from the Vatican website.
Observations have been made of the differences in the liturgical role of the Deacon which really begs the question: Why? We do not see this sort of variation with the other members of the clergy namely the Priest and the Bishop. So why do we have discrepancies among the Deacons? Is this a result of the liturgical formation or lack of it or incorrect application of it? A Deacon must be able to fulfil his liturgical role competently, confidently and in communion with his sacramental fraternity. A Deacon's words and actions in the Mass should foster reverence for all things sacred.
Another observation made is that not all celebrants (Priests) are familiar with the role of the assisting Deacon in the Mass. It becomes the responsibilty of the assisting Deacon to ensure that the main celebrant is briefed in good time to avoid confusion.
Improvisation of and/or deviation from the words and actions of the GIRM are the hallmarks of improper liturgical formation. Those Deacons who have, at some point in their lives, been altar servers do appear to conduct themselves on the sanctuary far more confidently and competently. Comments have also been made by Bishops and Priests about the poor liturgical preparedness and conduct of Deacons.
I would like to challenge my brother Deacons to share their thoughts on this topic.
Dcn Greg
